Discussion about this post

User's avatar
conor king's avatar

There is only so much you can cover but surely some reference to word order and flow is relevant and important? I learnt both Old Norse and Anglo Saxon many decades ago - both now barely remembered. What I do remember is that the flow of the language in Old Norse struck me as much more like modern English than Anglo Saxon did. Anglo-Saxon felt very german like (because it was close to Old HG and what became Dutch). Notably the use of past tense perfect verbs in the middle rather than the end of the sentence.

I believe there is evidence for the change showing up in writings pre the Conquest and the potential for French to have had a similar impact.

in sum how the language works is as, or more important, than lists of words. Another example from the islands off the other end of Asia: modern Japanese has numerous words taken from English and other world languages, often parallel to older Japanese words, but none of these affect how Japanese is structured.

Expand full comment
g.a.jennings's avatar

Excellent stuff! Wow. I love history at this level of detail. (I am also starting to learn about trade and craft, especially arms and armour.) Thank you

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts